Saturday, October 24, 2009

Bob's Armory, Chapter 9.

(This originally ran in June, 2008)

Chapter 9. Best gun, best load.

Those who follow the gun press will know that there is a never ending supply of arguments on this subject. For the longest time it was .45 vs 9 mm. Then the .40 cal and .357 auto got thrown into the mix. New, high tech bullets and new low-flash high-velocity powders also make news in the field. Changes, in my humble opinion, in the last 25 years or so, since the development of synthetic pistol frames, have been evolutionary rather than revolutionary.

The fact of the matter is there is no best gun or best load. It doesn't exist and probably never will. There are admittedly specialized areas where one particular technology might emerge as a clear number one, at least for a time, but concealed carry self defense is something of a generalist field. How much weight can you deal with? How much size? How sensitive to recoil are you? How much money are you willing to spend? How big are your hands? What sort of clothing do you routinely wear? All of this will make a difference, and it is different for everybody. There are, however, a few generally recognized and acknowledged truths in the field.

There is a power minimum that is desirable. Nobody wants to get shot, not even with a .22. In reality a .22 has some advantages in that it is cheap to shoot. You can afford to get good with it, and you will need to be if that's what you use. A .22 does not penetrate auto bodies or safety glass well, and during the winter, when the trolls wear more clothing, it may penetrate their bodies poorly after going through clothes. It will not reliably stop a determined attacker, two legged or four, without a CNS (central nervous system) hit. It will kill to be sure, but what you want from a defense weapon is to stop the bad guy from killing you. There is a difference.

Generally speaking, .380 or 9mm Makarov is the bottom line, although the .32 Silvertip has a decent reputation in actual use against people. Many knowledgeable gun people will tell you that the .38 Special is minimum, and the .38 Special +P is even more desirable. Larger diameter bullets may have the advantage in that they are already larger and do not need to expand to do the job. The .40 caliber was developed just for that purpose, to split the difference between large-slow bullets, like the .45, and light-fast bullets, like the 9mm. It does the job pretty well and the .40 cal has taken over the police market almost to where the .38 Special was in days gone by, at least in this country.

I am not even going to get into the argument about the best gun type, at least any deeper than the light pass I have made in previous chapters. The fact of the matter is that any reliable firearm in any decent caliber will do the job, if you can hit with it. If a high capacity 9mm is, in your mind, better for your purposes than a single-stack .45 auto, that is a perfectly valid decision. If you want to go with a .40 or .357 auto, that's cool too. If the simplicity of a revolver appeals to you and you are aware of and willing to put up with the limitations of a revolver, that is also a valid decision.

The very best gun and the very best load are, quite simply, what you have with you when you need it. The belly gun in your pocket is better than the cannon at home in the safe.

Get some training if you are going to carry a gun for personal protection. It is available. It cost money, and takes time, but it is available (and is almost certainly tax deductible for most of Paco's readership). If you are fortunate enough to have the right days off I recommend doing some competition, if there is a club available to you. Both IPSC (International Practical Shooting Confederation) and IDPA (International Defensive Pistol Association) have their adherents. I am a member of both, and have shot both competitively. My own opinion, for what that may be worth, is that IPSC has morphed (degenerated?) into track-and-field with a handgun and IDPA is a much more realistic operation for serious self-defense practice. Both have websites, both have publications, both have reasonable dues which are deductible to a working peace officer.

Get a gun, Get some training. Get some practice. Find something that you are comfortable with, that you can use well, and stick with it for a while, until you are reasonably comfortable and confident with your weapon and mode of carry. You are responsible for your own safety, and that of your family. Remember, when seconds count the police are only minutes away.

Next week will be a new chapter of Bob's Armory on long guns for home defense.

4 comments:

NewCO said...

Bob,

Thanks for the article, I have had many such discussions with people while I decide on what weapon to carry.. When I was in the Academy, I asked a fellow cadet, a self admitted gun nut, what he carried and what he thought I should carry. He told me that while he had a different gun for each day of the week, he goes out with nothing less than a 40 cal. When I told him that I was thinking of carrying a 9mm, he scoffed and said, "Why carry a weapon that might not do the job with one shot?" to which I replied, "If someone breaks into my house or endangers my family in some way, I am going to put more than one round into him, regardless of what I happen to have on my hip!". I have yet to decide on a weapon, but your insight will definitely help me make my decision.

bob walsh said...

Don't take too long to decide. You never know when you might need it.

kl2008a said...

Good point Bob, and with 50,000 knawling at the bit to get released it's better to have one than to wish you had one.

haha said...

i have carried everything from a 22 short to 44 magnum

it just doesnt matter - as long as you shoot it and shoot it well

whatever you are comfortable and accurate with

merely having the firearm will make the majority of cowards run..

cowards.. i mean crooks..dont like an even playing field esp someone who doesnt use a sideways shooting position