Sunday, August 17, 2008

What is Heaven Like? (Part I)

Note: Story-telling is an ancient form of communicating values, mores, and history from one generation to the next. The 20th Century scholar and Christian author, C. S. Lewis, noted that human beings most often communicate in word-pictures, which are helpful in conveying and understanding basic concepts. While more modernistic (and often complicated) teaching methods are promoted and instituted in American public schools, stories are what we often remember the best. Who has not gone to a meeting or lecture and walked away remembering an excellent joke offered by a presenter as a way to illustrate the topic of discussion?

The teachings of the Holy Bible are more than a collection of writings or a historical perspective of Judeo-Christian beliefs. In its most basic form, the Scriptures contain many great stories, including the "greatest story ever told." So it is not unusual to find (during his earthly ministry) that the founder of the Christian faith, Jesus, was a story-teller himself. His use of parables conveyed messages to both the commoner and scholar, which at their core are still applicable to the human condition 2,000 years later.

But how does one communicate to others something that is indescribable? Scholars have devoted lifetimes of study in attempts to understand human descriptions contained in Scripture of a place only a chosen few humans have caught glimpses of in visions, and only one man (Jesus) claimed to know intimately. This three-part Sunday Sermon series, called "What is Heaven Like?" will examine the descriptions of Heaven offered by Jesus in his teachings recorded in the gospel of Matthew.



What is Heaven Like?


(Part I)


In the gospel of Matthew in the New Testament, Jesus makes a number of statements, which begin with, "The kingdom of Heaven is like..." As a follower of Christ, I have gathered these Heaven-statements made by Jesus and offer my assessment of what these statements mean. This review is a presentation of what one of the twelve disciples (Levi, also called Matthew) wrote concerning what he heard Jesus say. Please feel free to read the gospel account for yourself.

Although there have been many testimonials offered about the hereafter through near-death experiences, it seems inconceivable that God would violate His very nature and established laws. One should consider why God might permit a sinner to enter Heaven without first receiving Christ as savior. If, indeed as Scripture declares, sin requires atonement, how could a sinner enter Heaven without atoning for his own sins? What kind of place must Heaven be like, if the laws governing it are so vital that no infraction can be tolerated? Therefore, can the accounts of people who have had near-death experiences be trusted?


The Bible is not silent on this matter. Old Testament accounts tell us briefly of two men who were suddenly taken from the Earth, by supernatural means. Genesis 5:24 (NIV) tells us a man called Enoch "...walked with God, then he was no more, because God took him." In the account of 2Kings 2:11 (NIV), we learn the prophet Elijah was walking with his disciple Elisha when "... suddenly a chariot of fire and horses of fire appeared and separated the two of them, and Elijah went up to heaven in a whirlwind."


When God called Enoch and Elijah to Heaven, there was no near-death experience. Both men ceased to exist here on earth. Most Biblical accounts either speak of chosen individuals having visions and being taken by the Holy Spirit into a portion of heaven for a specific purpose. None of the Biblical accounts speak of anyone being ill or near death, in fact, the subjects were conscious and interacting with angels and the Spirit of God, according to the record. And much of what they came back to share from these visions was difficult to understand and is still debated among biblical scholars and laypersons alike.

Similarly, there are Old and New Testament accounts of people who were dead being supernaturally resurrected by the power of the Holy Spirit (Jesus' friend Lazarus, comes to mind.) Yet there exists no record or interview from any of those individuals describing Heaven or their experiences being dead. God's prohibition of communicating with the dead through mediums, divination, sorcery, or spiritists (Leviticus 19:26, 31 and 20:6.) prevents believers from seeking answers from any other spiritual source than the word of God.

As he began his earthly ministry, Jesus presented Heaven in a unique and unexpected manner. Through a series of authoritative pronouncements (and parables), Jesus told followers he came from Heaven and knew God personally. Jesus drew clear distinctions about two places: Heaven and Hell. The contrasts were startling and difficult for many to accept.

So what is Heaven like? In one story, offered in Matthew 13:24-30, Jesus told of a farmer who sowed good seed in his wheat field. During the night, when everyone was sleeping, the man's enemy sowed weeds around the newly planted wheat. As the wheat crop started to grow, the weeds also appeared. When asked by his servants what to do about the weeds, the farmer instructed his help to wait until the wheat was fully matured at harvest, because pulling the weeds prematurely would result in good wheat being ruined. So at harvest, the servants pulled the weeds and tossed them into the fire, then collected all the wheat and stored it in his barn. Jesus explained in this parable that he was the farmer sowing the good seed and Satan was the enemy planting the weeds. Good seeds represented the followers of Jesus and the weeds the followers of Satan. The servants of the farmers are the angels who will weed out Satan's followers who will be cast into Hell, at the end of the age.

Based on this parable, it would appear that God makes no room for unrepentant sinners ANYWHERE in Heaven. Jesus declared himself as the arbiter in this story, who distinguished the good seed from the weeds and provided an outcome for both good and bad. As equally compelling is what Jesus did not say in this story. There is no appearance of a "gray area" in which some of the weeds might have been found acceptable to the farmer; so much for the power of positive thinking.

Jesus also compared Heaven to a treasure hidden in a field, in Matthew 13:44. Jesus said a man found this buried treasure, sold everything he possessed, and purchased the land containing the treasure. The man was filled with great joy. In Matthew 13:45-46, Jesus said Heaven was like a merchant who was in the business of purchasing fine pearls. One day the man found a pearl of great value and sold everything he had in order to buy it.

In both of these descriptions, we find people who were actively seeking God. They were rewarded by finding God. Once both men realized what they had discovered, nothing they owned could compare to what they were to receive. However, there was a trade off, so to speak. Metaphorically, both men gave up one lifestyle to attain a greater one. According to Jesus, life in Heaven far surpasses life on Earth.

Another similar parable in Matthew 13:47-50, uses a fishing analogy. A net was let down into the water by a group of fishermen. When they pulled the net up, there was a great variety of fish hauled up onto the shore. There, the fishermen began separating the good fish (and collecting them in baskets) from the bad. The bad fish were thrown away. Again, Jesus told his disciples the fishermen were his angels who would separate the good from the bad at the end of the age. Jesus informed his listeners the bad fish would be thrown into the fiery furnace (another Hell reference.)

The fishing parable is similar to the first farming parable, where angels are seen harvesting and separating the good from bad, while demonstratively rejecting the bad. The angelic fishing expedition implies a standard existed prior to the gathering of the haul of fish. The angels inspect each fish and reject those who are unworthy by Heavenly standards.

Jesus added an interesting side note in Matthew 13:52 about those who teach about the kingdom of Heaven, according to God's word. He said each one who teaches about the kingdom of heaven is like a homeowner who brings out of his own storeroom new and old treasures alike. It infers joy similar to the story of the man with the field and the pearl merchant. Sharing the promise of Heaven with others conveys both expected and unexpected blessings upon the bearer.

(copyright 2008, Gregory Allen Doyle)




26 comments:

Executive Emeritus said...

Whoa!
Too much PTL for me!

bob walsh said...

I think it was Oscar Wilde who said something about you go to Heaven for the climate and Hell for the company.

kl2008a said...
This post has been removed by the author.
kl2008a said...

or like the old saying "Everybody want's to go to Heaven, but nobody wants to die!"

mouse5856 said...

To The Gadfly -- Your post is very refreshing. Thank you :)

bob walsh said...

I never heard of anybody copyrighting a sermon before.

The Gadfly said...

It happens all the time, Bob. Ever read any of Billy Graham's books? Many of his books are collections of sermons.

Karl Marx copyrighted his sermons, didn't he?

bob walsh said...

No, I was never a Billy Graham fan. I will however happily take your word for it. I doubt that Karl Marx's works could be considered "sermons" in any reasonable sense of the word as Communism is officilly atheistic. I kind of thought that, if the object of a sermon was to bring to the masses the word of God, wouldn't you want it circulated as widely as possible, without necessarily expecting payment or credit for doing so? But that's just me I guess. I am hardly an expert on the subject.

Retired Guest said...
This post has been removed by the author.
danieliii said...

The 1611 King James Version (KJV) of the Bible has never been copyrighted and is free to anyone. Anything other than the KJV is likely copyrighted.

Other books were given for our information; the Bible was given for our transformation.

P.S.
In what I am sure is a typographical error, the last four references in Gadfly's copyrighted message contain inacurrate chapter references to Matthew; they should reference chapter 13, not 14. This is obvious, as there are only 36 verses in chapter 14, and the context of the verses may be found in Chapter 13.

The Gadfly said...

Bob,

In the broader sense of the word, a sermon is a persuasive communication about belief in God. One could certainly argue atheist Karl Marx was very persuasive in his unbelief in God, since entire countries fell to communism in the generation following the release of his manifesto. Secular "un-god worship" is a religion unto itself.

Bob, are you getting paid every Saturday for publishing your excellent Second Amendment articles? I am going to have a bone to pick with Paco, since he is getting my articles non-gratis. Remember, even Jesus announced "render to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God waht is God's." I hope by copyrighting my articles about God (which is allowable to any citizen who publishes an original work) that I have met both requirements.

The Gadfly said...

Retired guest,

Apparently, it is acceptable for everyone, except Christian writers, to take credit for their original works? Even King James received credit for his version of the King James Bible (hence, the King James Version.) Each one of the gospel writers received credit for their versions of the gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.)

A copyright is the legal claim of authorship and propietary rights. The issue of theft is still one of the Ten Commandments, and some folks on the Internet ignore TOS and steal copyrighted materials and profit from the same.

Other than the two books I have published about my faith in God, I receive no remuneration from writing about God. The royalties are quite modest, I assure you. My faith in God is not all about money as you suggest. It is my First Amendment right to free speech (feel free to jump in and defend my Constitutional rights here, Bob Walsh.)Just kidding...

The Gadfly said...

Daniel,

Whether King James or NIV, you are correct regarding the chapter citations. Thank you for poiting out my error. It will be taken care of promptly.

As for the issue of copryright, who was credited for the King James Version? Was it King John?

As for your assertion that the KJV is free to everyone, try that excuse when you walk out of Borders without paying for a copy.

bob walsh said...

You are absolutely right in your ability to speak and write with constitutional protection. Wonderful thing. I confess I am a little fuzzy about copyrighting things that have a huge hunk of bible quoted directly, but I am hardly an expert on copyright law, though I do have one copyright to my name. The work is primarily photographic, not written.

I see RGs comment has disappeared, and I don't remember it that well. I do believe that a huge hunk of "the church" (just as any other large organization) is primarily interested in operating and supporting the organization, irrespective of whatever message, good or service that organization may be "selling". Clearly in a modern world money is necessary to function. I would, I confess, be HUGELY surprised if the royalties from your sermons resulted in any significant income to you.

I also confess to having mixed thoughts about "un-god" and secular humanism being religious structures. I am unsure that irreligious, unreligious, and anti-religious are co-equal expressions.

I get no income from my gun articles. I do get free advertising for my photo book from Jeff, but that was never a "deal" or a quid-pro-quo in any sense of the word. In addition, I get zero royalties on the photo book, and it has had almost zero sales. Electronic publishing is handy, but it can result in a near-prohibitive cost per copy. Since I did it for a combination of a grade in a class and an ego stroke and succeeded at both, I am content.

Correct me if my theological history is also a bit fuzzy. I seem to recall that King James had some pretty heavy duty political reasons for publishing the KJV, and the decisions as to what was in it, and what was omitted, had major political overtones as well, both religious and secular. I also seem to recall that someone much smarter than I once said, "Religion has the same relation to God that Truth has to History; essentially none."

But you keep on writing. I am happy to see a literate Christian who can follow a logical argument about a basically illogical (faith based) subject. Next year I will send you some of my Harvest Festival Cookies as a token of my esteem.

Retired Guest said...

To clear any mystery, I just decided I had better uses for my energy, Bob. So I just deleted it all. Hate it when I get sucked into those issues.

bob walsh said...

No need to justify yourself to me. Personally I love arguing / discussing / fighting about "religion". I find it intellectually stimulating. The problem I have is finding people who are willing to indulge in an intellectual discussion about religion. It's very personal to many people, and leaves little room for discussion with many. That old First Commandment is the bottom line for many people. To them it is simple; "My way or the highway. Signed God." That's one of the nice things about paganism. We pagans definitely have a big tent approach to religion. Unfortunately (for us) monotheistic prosletyzing religions don't. Many believe that their God is the one true God, their way to that God is the one true way. If you don't believe the way they believe you are wrong, you are somehow less of a person than they are. From there it is but a small step to the notion that you are less valuable a person than they are, and another small step to you are not a person at all. Then out come the stakes and firewood. "Suffer not a witch to live." That's pretty plain. Go along with the program, or else.

danieliii said...

For free King James Bibles, contact
http://www.spirit1.us/dir_06/ (Even the shipping is free!); or
http://www.biblepath.com/bible_download.html

For a free download to MP3 of the King James Bible, contact
http://www.spirit1.us/dir_06/

For a free ebook download of the King James Bible, contact
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/10


However, my favorite is
http://www.bpsmilford.org/about.html
Bearing Precious Seed's English Bibles are the Authorized King James Version of the Bible.

An excerpt from their website:
For a person to have the Word of God in his language is perhaps the greatest blessing he can receive. That is the reason Bearing Precious Seed was established as the Bible publishing ministry of First Baptist Church in Milford, Ohio. Since 1973, this local church ministry has printed and distributed more than 45 million Bibles and Scripture portions in 42 languages.

Bearing Precious Seed's mission has always been to: Provide the Word of God ... at no profit ... to a world in desperate need ... through the local church. Since inception, Bearing Precious Seed has published the Word of God in 42 languages. English, French, Spanish, and Italian are perhaps the more popular, but the ministry's publishing ability ranges from Ukrainian to Arabic to Thai.

Where do all these Scriptures go? Almost daily, shipments leave Milford, Ohio and El Paso, Texas for destinations in Latin American, Europe, Africa, and Asia, where they are distributed under the auspices of local missionaries and Christian nationals.

In the U.S., there are seventeen missionary families who work closely with Bearing Precious Seed. Five are headquartered in El Paso, Texas, where Bearing Precious Seed has a complete printing operation that focuses on Spanish Scriptures for distribution in Mexico and other Latin American countries. Each year, hundreds of volunteers from church groups come to El Paso to coordinate Scripture distribution campaigns in Mexico.

The need is evident. The harvest is abundant everywhere and Bearing Precious Seed fervently believes the best results are yet to be seen. Psalm 68:11 says, "The Lord gave the Word: great was the company of those that published it." Will you be a part of that company?

danieliii said...

"The Trail of Blood . . ."
Following the Christians Down Through the Centuries . . .
or The History of Baptist Churches From the Time of Christ,
Their Founder, to the Present Day
by J. M. Carroll

(Dr. J. M. Carroll, the author of this book, was born in the state of Arkansas, January 8, 1858, and died in Texas, January 10, 1931.)

Excerpts:
The history of Baptists, he discovered, was written in blood. They were the hated people of the Dark Ages. Their preachers and people were put into prison and untold numbers were put to death. The world has never seen anything to compare with the suffering, the persecutions, heaped upon Baptists by the Catholic Hierarchy during the Dark Ages. The Pope was the world's dictator. This is why the Ana-Baptists, before the Reformation, called the Pope The Anti-Christ.

Their history is written in the legal documents and papers of those ages. It is through these records that the "TRAIL OF BLOOD" winds its way as you find such statements--

"At Zurich, after many disputations between Zuinglius and the Ana-Baptists, the Senate made an Act, that if any presume to re-baptize those who were baptized before (i.e. as infants) they should be drowned. At Vienna many Ana-Baptists were tied together in chains that one drew the other after him into the river, wherein they were all suffocated (drowned)." (Vida Supra, p. 61)

"In the year of our Lord 1539 two Ana-Baptists were burned beyond Southwark, and a little before them 5 Dutch Ana-Baptists were burned in Smithfield," (Fuller, Church History.)

"In 1160 a company of Paulicians (Baptists) entered Oxford. Henry II ordered them to be branded on the forehead with hot irons, publicly whipped them through the streets of the city, to have their garments cut short at the girdles, and be turned into the open country. The villages were not to afford them any shelter or food and they perished a lingering death from cold and hunger." (Moore, Earlier and Later Nonconformity in Oxford, p. 12.)

The old Chronicler Stowe, A.D. 1533, relates:

"The 25th of May--in St. Paul's Church, London--examined 19 men and 6 women. Fourteen of them were condemned; a man and a woman were burned at Smithfield, the other twelve of them were sent to towns there to be burned."

1. What we know today as "Christianity" or the Christian Religion, began with Christ, A.D. 25-30 in the days and within the bounds of the Roman Empire. One of the greatest empires the world has ever known in all its history.

2. This Empire at that period embraced nearly all of the then known inhabited world. Tiberius Caesar was its Emperor.

3. In its religion, the Roman Empire, at that time, was pagan. A religion of many gods. Some material and some imaginary. There were many devout believers and worshipers. It was a religion not simply of the people, but of the empire. It was an established religion. Established by law and supported by the government. (Mosheim, Vol. 1, Chap. 1.)

4. The Jewish people, at that period, no longer a separate nation, were scattered throughout the Roman Empire. They yet had their temple in Jerusalem, and the Jews yet went there to worship, and they were yet jealous of their religion. But it, like the pagan, had long since drifted into formalism and had lost its power. (Mosheim, Vol. 1, Chap. 2.)

5. The religion of Christ being a religion not of this world, its founder gave it no earthly head and no temporal power. It sought no establishment, no state or governmental support. It sought no dethronement of Caesar. Said its author, "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God the things that are God's." (Matt, 22:19-22; Mark 12:17; Luke 20:20). Being a spiritual religion it was a rival of no earthly government. Its adherents, however, were taught to respect all civil law and government. (Rom. 13:1-7; Titus 3:1; 1 Pet. 2:13-16)


For more, go to
http://www.trailofblood.com/The%20Trail%20Of%20Blood.htm

danieliii said...

A Brief History of the King James Bible

By Dr. Laurence M. Vance

http://www.av1611.org/kjv/kjvhist.html

danieliii said...

Various Contradictions and Omissions
This table compares various verses in the KJV, NIV, NASB, and NWT.

Excerpt:
One of the fundamental deceptions being promoted by modern Bible publishers is that the new Bibles are merely in different styles of writing; that they are simply easier to read than the KJV; that nothing is being removed or changed in God's word.

There are many problems with these claims. Here we will focus on the disception that "all versions really say the same thing."

Why is this important? It is simple: if two books say different things, or if two books say inherently contradictory things, or if of two books one says more than the other, they cannot both be God's word. This is simple, basic logic. To say otherwise is to accuse the Holy Spirit of doublespeak.

To access Bible Version Verse Comparison Charts, go to:
http://av1611.com/kjbp/charts/various.html

The Gadfly said...

Bob,

Your point is well-taken concerning "legalism" within organized Christianity. To the extent that Christians believe there is One True God, I hope you would agree that if this so, it would be contrary on the part of believing Christians to harbor such information to the exclusion of all non-believers. That is waht got the Jews in trouble with God in Isaiah's day.

On the other hand, God has allowed each of us a choice to believe or not believe in Him. It should not make a difference how a believer treats a non-believer. After all, we are all created by Him. It seems to me the matter will be settled by Him, no matter what we choose to believe. And there is the rub.

As for the "suffer not a witch to live" reference, the context of the instruction was concerning the Israelites (Jews) and idolatry. God later took issue with Israel for allowing other religions to set up altars in high places and poles used to worship other deities. It created a huge chasm between God and His chosen people.

As for King James, I am not familiar with his role in assembling the first widely circulated Bible. I know there is a movement among modern day Christians who believe the King James Version is the ONLY true Bible. I do not subscribe to that argument.

If it makes any difference in what I am tryin to convey, Bob, one of my closest and lifelong friends is an avowed atheist. He has a very strong belief system, which does not include God. I suspect his faith must be much greater than mine to believe so strongly in nothing.

bob walsh said...

I am not convinced that failure to believe in God, or Gods, is to believe in nothing. Most of the hard-core atheists I know (very few) believe in science. Their idea is that life came into being on this little blue/green ball through a series of events that had nothing to do with a supernatural creator. While that is almost certainly not "religion" in any conventional sense it is also certainly not nothing.

There is also a huge difference in my pointy little head between not harboring information and prosletyzing. Looking at it another way, you can print bibles and hand them out at the street corner until the cows come home. That neither bothers nor offends me. When you ring my door bell and wake my happy ass up in the morning with the firm conviction that your God is so utterly necessary in my life that you are doing me an imense favor by thrusting him upon me, I then become offended.

That's one of the things I find so pleasant about the Jews. If you were not born into their group, they don't particularly want you. If you decide you want in, you have to work at it. If you want out, they will feel sorry and will miss you, but take no active steps to prevent you from leaving. That outlook is fine with me. Very civilized.

Jack said...

bob walsh wrote: "I am not convinced that failure to believe in God, or Gods, is to believe in nothing."

It could also be that to believe in nothing - that is to disassociate one's understanding of God from any worldly thing (including religion) - is to truly begin a relationship with God.

Regarding the kingdom of God, Jesus also said:

"Neither shall they say, Look here! or, look there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you."
Luke 17:21

The kingdom is not in this world. It is not to be found in scriptures (for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.” -II Cor 3:5 & 6), within a person or within symbols such as Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism etc. The Kingdom of God is only to be found in a RELATIONSHIP with God within each one of us, a relationship that cannot ever be adequately described using any words/symbols/idols/ideas etc. Words/symbols/idols/ideas are THINGS in and of this world. And we are not to be of this world.

"The cause of all things is neither soul nor intellect; nor has it imagination, opinion, or reason, or intelligence; nor is it spoken or thought. ... It is neither essence, nor eternity, nor time."

- Dionysius the Areopagite

"Because we are not capable of knowing what God is but only what He is not, we cannot contemplate how God is but only how He is not."

"This is the ultimate in human knowledge of God: to know that we do not know Him."

- St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica

So a relationship with God can look very much like atheism to those who worship a religion rather than what is behind that religion. When we mistake scriptures or names of God (i.e. symbols) with the reality of the Living God, we are truly practicing idolatry.

kl2008a said...

Man, it's taken a lot of reading to get to this point in the dialogue, but it brings me back to a time and place when I was much younger and sitting on that stool, about to take a long hard sip of a cold one, when I saw over a big mirror a sign that said: "We don't talk about religion or politics in here!". Just reflecting back to that time brings a chuckle.

I fall back on "I'll respect you and you respect me, and we can both agree to disagree, and move on from there. To each their own.
Peace Bros (and Sis').

The Gadfly said...

Bob,

I whole-heartedly agree that "in-your-face" or "on your doorstep" evangelism takes passion for one's faith farther than is reasonable. In Matthew, Jesus declared for believers to make disciples (not Fuller Brush Men) of all nations. In his three years of ministry, I cannot find one example of Jesus beating anyone's door down to talk about God. In fact, the opposite was true, people were flocking to hear Jesus or inviting him to their homes as a guest.

Science has become the religion of many atheists. If it cannot be prodded or poked with a stick, it does not exist in atheism. So if, as atheism (without God-ism) contends that God does not exist, and all that now exist was the result of some random collision of particles no one witnessed, in effect, it is a belief in nothing. The soul cannot be poked or prodded, so it does not exist (nothing.) When you die, you are dead; end of story (nothing.) No hope, no future, no eternity, nothing. Atheism is essentially a belief in nothing more than a few short years of life on this Earth and nothing beyond it.

bob walsh said...

I disagree. Science does not say that a thing that can not be proven to exist does not exist. It merely says it can not be PROVEN to exist. There is a difference.

(This whole string has been, in my humble opinion, a "good" argument on religion. Civilized, erudite, absent name-calling. The way it should be done.)