Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Oakland Tribune to DAPO: Stop the dance

Note: The following Op-Ed is reprinted in its entirety, without permission of the Oakland Tribune. As a matter of policy, Paco excerpts and attributes outside sources within Fair Use guidelines. In this case, the editorial is SO on-the-mark, I opted to risk the wrath of the editors.

In that context, PLEASE click any one of the
links provided, in the hope the extra traffic convinces the folks at the Trib to leave Paco be. Barring that, I am forced to note the following is ODDLY similar to what Paco has been saying here for MONTHS. Is Paco saying the Oakland Tribune Op-editors plagiarized this blog? Let's just say he's content to let it go if they are...

Editorial: California parole officials should stop bureaucratic dance on Phillip Garrido case
MediaNews editorial

AT A CERTAIN point, the bureaucratic response of public officials is simply not enough. Unless and until our government leaders own up to their mistakes and accept responsibility, they are destined to repeat them. Sometimes that's just unacceptable.

Such is the case of state parole officers' failure to unmask that sex offender Phillip Garrido and his wife were hiding kidnap victim Jaycee Dugard in their backyard near Antioch for 18 years. For the last 11 of those years, state parole officers were responsible for monitoring Garrido.

They visited him at least 60 times, yet they never noticed that something was amiss. They never bothered to read the previous federal parole file on Garrido. They never noticed the compound at the back of the property where Dugard and her two children fathered by Garrido were being held. They never saw utility wires that had been strung to the hideout. They failed to talk to neighbors or local law enforcement. They ignored information from the GPS monitor on Garrido that showed him straying too far from his home. They failed to act on information showing Garrido had violated the terms of his parole.

It was just a combination of Garrido's own stupidity and an alert police officer at UC Berkeley that eventually led to his capture. In the end, Garrido's parole officer played a role in his arrest. But that doesn't excuse the complete breakdown up to that point in the supervision of Garrido.

As we now know, thanks to an in-depth review released last week by the state Office of the Inspector General, parole agents in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation completely bungled the Garrido case.

It's appalling that soon after Garrido's arrest in August, Corrections spokesman Gordon Hinkle was bragging about the parole agent's role. "We're very proud of the work he did in uncovering this mystery," Hinkle said at the time, adding that the agent had operated "by the book."

We might be inclined to cut the department some slack now if it was showing signs of acknowledging fault in the face of the new information about its conduct — and recognizing that the case suggests widespread systemic problems in the organization. Instead, the response by Corrections Secretary Matthew Cate smacks of bureaucratize and denial. While acknowledging in his official response to the report that "further improvements in our system of parole supervision are needed," Cate then goes on to talk about the need for more money to supervise parolees.

Secretary Cate, your folks messed up — and no amount of extra money would have changed that. They visited the site 60 times. If they didn't notice something was amiss after that, they should be fired. And if you don't recognize the need to shake things up, Gov. Schwarzenegger should fire you. At a certain point, lack of money is not an excuse.

Consider, in contrast, the tone of the response by Contra Costa Sheriff Warren Rupf, whose deputies in 2006 failed to properly follow a tip that could have led to finding Dugard nearly three years ago.

"We should have been inquisitive, more curious, and turned over a rock or two. There are no excuses," Rupf said soon after Dugard was found. "... I can't change the course of events, but we are beating ourselves up over this and are the first to do so."

Whether its curing an addiction or fixing a bureaucracy, the first step to healing is admitting responsibility. Cate would do well to learn from the sheriff.

Today Marks Veteran's Day.

The hostilities of "The Great War" stopped on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, even though the actual Treaty of Versailles was not signed until about 7 months later. The following year Woodrow Wilson recognized the day. Veteran's groups have successfully fought efforts to shift the day to a three-day holiday floater, which is in my opinion a good thing. There is something significant about THE DAY that should be recognized and not turned into a homogenized generic long weekend.

I hope all of Paco's readers will fly their flag today (you DO have one, don't you???) and honor, in whatever way seems appropriate to you, those among us who risked their lives, and especially to those who gave their lives, in the interest of freedom.

Freedom isn't free. When we forget that, we run the risk of loosing it. (Please, no partisan political comments from either side. This isn't the day for it.)

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Prison Director Requests Furlough Exemption.

The Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections (You didn't really think it was us, did you?) has requested that prison staff be exempted from the mandatory state employee furlough program.

Howard Skolnik has requested exemption for "guards" and other essential staff through the budget period ending in June 2011.

State lawmakers have ordered the one day per month furloughs in order to save $330 million during the two year Nevada budget cycle. They allowed for about $4 million in public safety exemptions, but the prison system exemptions requested would cost about $8 million.

The Director has stated that requiring furloughs would strain his agency, which is already understaffed, and would jeopardize safety of staff and inmates within the system.

A board consisting of the Governor, the A. G. and the Secretary of State will meet today in Carson City to consider the Director's request.

It must be nice to have an agency director that understands what is actually happening within his agency and has the courage to stand up and say what he needs. Wish we had one of those.

Thanks to Centurion for the heads up on this one.

ADDENDUM: He got his exemption.

Beds Cost Money, Money Means Voters.

San Joaquin County, like many others, has a critical shortage of jail bed space. Relatively minor offenders serve a small portion of their sentence, some serve virtually none. The jail is operating under a population cap. When that cap is reached, people are kicked out. Some of them are pre-trial, some are people serving a sentence. There is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that this sad state of affairs is having a serious negative effect on the crime rate in San Joaquin County. Criminals are often busted or one thing or another during time when they should be locked up but were kicked out for lack of a bed.

San Joaquin County could have a much larger jail in 4 years, it the tax payers have deep enough pockets to pay for it, and the political will to do so.

The taxpayers turned down a tax increase in 1989 to pay for a larger jail. The current jail opened in 1992 and, from the day it first opened, was kicking out prisoners due to overcrowding.

The county Board of Supervisors is hopeful. This year they let a contract for architectural services and construction management. Funding is the issue.

San Joaquin County has a sales tax that varies from 8.75 to 9.25 percent, depending on exactly where in the county you are. The closer it gets to 10 percent, the more public resistance there is. A parcel tax is being considered, which would tack $222 on each parcel of land within the county. They are also considering formation of a community facilities district, which would have the same effect as a parcel tax though the tax would be larger or smaller depending on the size or use of the parcel.

It's hard to ask the taxpayers for more money during the current economic situation. It is also hard to put up with repeat criminals who know that they are unlikely to actually serve much jail time even if they are convicted except for the most serious crimes.

We will pay up front, or we will pay later. The choice is ours.

Clicking on the title will link to an article in todays Stockton RECORD on this subject.

Monday, November 09, 2009

SAC CO popped for gun & conspiracy to mule

CDCR Officer Faces Weapons Charges
California Corrections Officer Accused Of Bringing Drugs, Weapons Into Prison

UPDATED: 4:47 pm PST November 4, 2009

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- A California state correctional officer allegedly brought drugs and weapons into a prison facility...Domingo Gardea Garcia, 39, bailed out of jail Wednesday after being arrested on several counts.

Sacramento County sheriff's spokesman Sgt. Tim Curran confirmed Garcia was arrested Monday at California State Prison, Sacramento. Curran identified Garcia as a state correctional officer.

In addition to charges of bringing drugs and weapons into a prison facility, Garcia was also booked on suspicion of conspiracy to bring drugs into a prison facility...(Full text at KCRA.com)